The $3 Trillion SubStack on How to Destroy Pfizer in Court

June 5, 2023: I’ve made this SubStack FREE as it is in high-demand for those trying to understand whether or not Pfizer has liability from civil or criminal charges. The answer is that Pfizer has NO immunity (as Robert Barnes brilliantly argued in the Brook Jackson whistleblower case.) While the judge in Brook Jackson’s case dismissed the case with prejudice, it was not based on ‘imaginary immunity’ for Pfizer. The judge’s decision was based on precedent whistleblower cases.

March 3, 2023: Brook Jackson’s attorney, Robert Barnes, had a strong day in court last week with the $3 trillion false claims lawsuit against Pfizer, by driving home that Pfizer was contracted to deliver a safe and effective vaccine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. He pointed out to the judge that the contract promises the delivery of a safe and effective vaccine under FDA laws more than a half-dozen times.

I spoke to Brook’s attorney Warner Mendenhall in July of 2022 who asked my opinion on Pfizer’s motion to dismiss. I stated that you can’t contract to commit a crime. Pfizer was contracted to deliver a safe and effective vaccine.

Since the summer of last year, I’ve stated that under the Operation Warp Speed (OWS) contract, the US military contracted with Pfizer to “deliver a safe and effective vaccine capable of providing protection against SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses (variants) subject to FDA technical, clinical and regulatory success (laws and guidance)” AND in compliance with Good Manufacturing Practices. Pfizer forfeited their EUA immunity rights under their contract with the DoD under the Trump administration.

Pfizer collaborated with the FDA to lie to the US military, the American people, and President Trump that their mRNA nanoparticle technologies were safe and effective vaccines. In fact, Pfizer knew their mRNA technology would only cause disease, disabilities and death and offer no immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Per the contract, Pfizer was also in charge of the data of submitted to the DoD, which they clearly falsified per Brook Jackson’s testimony.

Share

Many of the points Barnes highlights in his InfoWars interview regarding Pfizer’s violation of their Operation Warp Speed contract can be found in the below January 13, 2023 SubStack where I annotate specific pages, paragraphs and phrases from the contract.

Originally Posted on January 13, 2023: You can NOT contract to commit a crime, any crime. Just to be clear, Pfizer can NOT go through the entire Initial New Drug (IND) application process, Phase 1/2/3, Biological License Application (BLA), pay the $3 million dollar Pharmaceutical Drug User Fee (PDUFA), FDA-approval, post-marketing clinical requirements, and manufacture and market FDA-approved product and then claim that under their contract with the DoD they were instructed to perform the clinical trials and receive FDA-approval as a part of a psyop. This is the most ridiculous story I have heard so far in an attempt to defend Pfizer’s EUA vaccine immunity shield which is completely shattered.

The only reason why Pfizer is getting away with murder is because Pfizer is influencing the narrative that we are listening to from trusted leaders and media platforms on both sides of the COVID-19 isle to convince the entire population of the United States that their injectable COVID-19 mRNA lipid nanoparticle bioweapons are;

1. safe and effective vaccines,
2. vaccines gone wrong, or
3. bioweapons, but Pfizer is following orders from the US military under a military contract and under EUA law Pfizer has legal immunity, so there is nothing we can do about it.

These are all false statements.

Share

“Pfizer’s Operation Warp Speed (OWS) contract with the DoD was to develop a vaccine that effectively prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 disease) and that met the safety and efficacy regulatory standards of an FDA-EUA authorized or FDA-approved vaccine.” — Karen Kingston, January 13, 2023

As we read through the DoD contract, it’s clear that Pfizer is in charge of communications with the FDA. Per the FDA documents, Pfizer exerted extreme influence over the FDA forcing the FDA to ignore safety flags during the clinical trials, thereby strong-arming the FDA to fraudulently authorize and then fraudulently approve a bioweapon as a safe and effective vaccine.

FALSE. Per the contract, the vaccine prototypes were part of a manufacturing demonstration, however the ‘vaccine prototypes’ would be categorized as emergency use authorized (EUA) or FDA-approved vaccines after receiving FDA authorization or FDA approval. If vaccine prototypes never received FDA authorization or approval, then they would have remained manufacturing prototypes and never distributed as vaccines to the US civilian population.

Pfizer’s Operation Warp Speed contract with the DoD was to produce 100 million doses of a vaccine (vaccine prototype) capable of providing protection against SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses (variants) subject to FDA technical, clinical and regulatory success (laws and guidance).

Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines COULD NOT have been made available to the American public until after FDA regulatory approval per Sec 564 of the FD&C Act for an EUA authorized product or Sect 351 of PHS Act for a FDA-approval of a biological product based on successful clinical trial data.

If the FDA failed to provide authorization or approval, then Pfizer’s manufactured vaccine doses would not be made available to the US or global market.

This means that the ‘vaccine prototypes’ would be categorized as emergency use authorized (EUA) vaccines after receiving FDA authorization and then FDA-approved vaccines after receiving FDA-approval. The term prototype is a legal term confirming the reduction in process clause in the contract, confirming Pfizer as the original inventor of the vaccine technology whether it be FDA-approved or FDA-authorized.

FALSE. The contract states that Pfizer and BioNTech will work jointly together on the clinical trials and the commercialization for the vaccine upon regulatory approval (EUA authorization or FDA approval/BLA approval).

Although part of the contract states that BioNTech is the regulatory sponsor and the EUA/BLA holder, per the contract Pfizer was instructed to act as the clinical trial sponsor and EUA/BLA holder, and in fact, has acted in those roles.

Any attorney or contract expert worth their weight in salt would point out that Section B. Clinical and Regulatory is nullified by Section A. Regulatory Planning which designates;

1. Pfizer as the regulatory sponsor when the contract states, “Pfizer will meet the necessary FDA requirements for conducting ongoing and planned clinical trials…” and
2. Pfizer and BioNTech as the EUA/BLA holder when the contract states, “Pfizer will meet the necessary FDA requirements for conducting ongoing and planned clinical trials, and with its collaboration partner, BioNTech will seek FDA approval or authorization for the vaccine.”

An example on how Pfizer acted as the sponsor is when Pfizer paid the approximate $3 million Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA Fee) in May of 2021 when submitting for FDA approval.

It’s important to note that all FDA letters regarding approval or authorization of the Pfizer vaccine refer to the vaccine as the “Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine” and are addressed directly to Pfizer.

FALSE. Per the COMIRNATY website, Pfizer and BioNTech are currently marketing and distributing FDA-approved COMIRNATY in the United States for adults and children 12-years of age and older.

FALSE. Per the National Drug Code (NDC) database, FDA-approved and COMIRNATY-labeled product was available in the United States on December 22, 2021.

The above image is from a video of a soldier in possession of the FDA-approved COMIRNATY and reading the NDC code that was issued for FDA-approved product available in the United States beginning on December 22, 2021 from the COMIRNATY vial.

FALSE. Per the DoD contract, Pfizer and BioNTech initiated the Phase 1/2 trials independent of any contract or work done with the US military.

Share

The contract clearly states that clinical trials are regulated by HHS and the FDA and that the US military is not involved.

The contract clearly states that Pfizer is in charge of all communications with the FDA.

FALSE. Per the contract, all of the data related to Pfizer’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccines was and will continue to be generated by Pfizer (and BioNTech) without government funding, and Pfizer owns all of the data.

Per the contract, Pfizer controls the format of the data and is under no obligation to provide custom reports to the US military.

FALSE. Per the contract, Pfizer is in charge of CMC (chemistry, manufacturing and controls) manufacturing for their COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Pfizer established US manufacturing facilities for manufacturing mRNA vaccines in the United States.

Per the FDA approval letter, FDA-approved COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were approved to be manufactured at Pfizer’s facility in Kalamazoo, MI.

Share

FALSE. While EUA laws waive GMP (good manufacturing practices), the military contract clearly contracts that Pfizer will ensure conformity with GMP per the Food & Drug Consumer Protection Act, 21 USC 351a2B. This is important because Pfizer can not claim they didn’t know what was in the vials due to a lack of GMP requirements as they were contracted to adhere to GMP.

FALSE. Per the contract, all inventions conceived in performance of the contract are owned by Pfizer; “As between Pfizer and the Government, all inventions conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the performance of this Statement of Work (“Subject Inventions”) shall be owned by Pfizer.” If the military did develop the nanotechnology, the military transferred the US intellectual property over to Pfizer’s ownership.

Furthermore, Pfizer may withhold trade secrets from the government; “If invented solely by Pfizer, Pfizer will be able to elect, in its discretion, whether to hold Subject Inventions as trade secrets, and holding a Subject Invention as a trade secret will not forfeit title to the Government.”

FALSE. This brings me back to my first point, you can not contract to commit a crime. While Pfizer is designated as a Covered Person in the contract, the contract and the immunity it grants are predicated on developing a medical countermeasure that is a safe and effective vaccine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection, not a bioweapon.

Pfizer is NOT a Covered Person. Per the manufacturing responsibilities designated to them in the contract, Pfizer is the manufacturer and sponsor, just like Moderna and J&J are manufacturers in their contracts, because that is reality. In reality, Pfizer can no more claim immunity as a ‘covered person’ just because the DoD randomly claimed as such at the end of the contract, than they can identify as a ‘fairy princess with US government immunity to unleash a bioweapon on the US civilian population and call it fairy dust.’

Now back to reality, the countermeasure Pfizer was contracted to manufacture is a vaccine capable of providing protection against SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses (variants) subject to FDA technical, clinical and regulatory success (laws, regulatory guidance and bona fide research).

However, Pfizer did not develop an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 and its variants. Furthermore, Pfizer instructed the FDA to disregard safety signals to stop the clinical trials thereby engaging in fraudulent and criminal trials that are not bona fide research.

Per Pfizer’s November 2020 submission, Pfizer instructed the FDA to disregard unfavorable reactogenecity data from 100 children ages 12 through 15 years of age.

Reactogenicity events in these children may have been and likely included; myocarditis, multi-system inflammatory system, heart attacks (sudden death), stroke, convulsions, and death.

Pfizer informed the FDA that 409 patients came down with COVID-19 or reactogenecity symptoms (see above list that includes death) within 7 days of their first or second injectio. Pfizer informed the FDA that they did not include these cases as adverse events or as COVID-19 because they may have been severe reactions to the injections and the subjects did not have a positive PCR test, so Pfizer simply did not count them, in caae they were unconfirmed COVID-19 cases. Pfizer told the FDA their shots were causing disease, disabilities and death, but to simply disregard unfavorable evidence that the shots are bioweapons.

In the November 2020 FDA submission, Pfizer states that they do not know how their mRNA vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2.

In the August 23, 2021, FDA approval of Pfizer’s biological license application (BLA), the FDA states that Pfizer had NOT provided any DATA to demonstrate that the vaccine was effective; Missing Information = Vaccine Effectiveness.

Per important identified risks and important potential risks, the FDA confirmed that the data Pfizer did provide confirms that the mRNA injections cause severe diseases such as myocarditis, pericarditis, and likely causes vaccine-associated enhanced disease and vaccine-associated enhanced respiratory disease.

In a post-hoc analysis, Pfizer confirmed with the FDA that the risk of COVID-19 increases over time in study participants after they received a second dose of the COVID-19 mRNA injections.

Biological agents that do not prevent infection or disease, are not done under bona fide research, and in fact cause infection, disease, and death are not a vaccines….they are bioweapons.

Pfizer was contracted by the US military to manufacture a safe and effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Pfizer somehow strong-armed the FDA into ignoring all safety signals in order to enable Pfizer to knowingly and intentionally manufacture, distribute and promote bioweapons, specifically lipid nanoparticle technologies encoded to produce the Wuhan-Hu-1 SARS-CoV-2 S-2P spike protein, as a safe and effective vaccines.

Pfizer’s contract with the US military and any immunity it provided is unlawful, illegal and criminal, as Pfizer knowingly and willingly developed and released a bioweapon on the US civilian population. Pfizer’s actions are in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention.

Pfizer is also in violation of all International Human Rights Laws, including; the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Nuremberg Code, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Every state in the United States of America has specific criminal charges that can be brought against the regulatory team members at Pfizer for developing, distributing, marketing and making readily available a bioweapon (or weapon of mass destruction) to the American people under the guise of a safe and effective vaccine.

Share The Kingston Report

If you know of victims who have been harmed by Pfizer vaccines, you can utilize the evidence I provide and your state laws to file criminal charges against Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine regulatory and marketing team members and have arrest warrants issued.

Push back on trusted experts refusing to call the injections bioweapons or who are spinning the laws, evidence, government contracts and documents, and Pfizer’s own documents to try and convince us that there is ‘nothing we can do’ to hold Pfizer accountable for developing and unleashing a bioweapon on civilian American adults and children.

Nothing about what Pfizer has done is legal or protected under any US laws and is in violation of the 9th and 14th Amendments. You can not legally unleash a bioweapon on a civilian population.

The only reason why Pfizer is getting away with murder is because they have influenced the narrative on both sides of the COVID-19 story to convince the entire population of the United States that the bioweapons are;

1. safe and effective vaccines,
2. vaccines gone wrong, or
3. bioweapons, but Pfizer is following orders from the US military under a military contract and EUA law, so there is nothing we can do about it.

These are all lies.

The US military contracts and FDA documents indicate that Pfizer was calling all the shots on the bioweapons (no pun intended). It is my understanding that Pfizer’s contracts with other non-US countries also indicate that Pfizer usurped power from government agencies and the military.

If we the people wake up and understand that we unalienable God-given rights and the authority to believe our own eyes, ears and experiences, call the vaccines what they are – bioweapons, and pursue criminal charges against Pfizer, we the people will take our country back.

Source: The $3 Trillion SubStack on How to Destroy Pfizer in Court