The right to declare an emergency would entirely belong to the World Health Organization.
QUICK FACTS:
- Dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University Michele Bachmann spoke with Steve Bannon on his podcast, War Room, to discuss the Biden administration’s ongoing push for 194 countries to hand health sovereignty to the World Health Organization (WHO).
- The agreement between all these nations would prevent America from making a decision that differs from the WHO, effectively eliminating American rights in future health emergencies.
- Although the worldwide agreement was initially stymied, the Biden administration recently reaffirmed their support for a Pandemic Accord.
- Bachmann explained the move would transform the WHO from an advisory body to a regulatory body.
- “Now the WHO would have the power to mandate vaccines and mandate lockdowns, and all the rest,” she said.
- Bannon replied, saying the WHO is essentially owned by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), operating in accordance with China’s will.
- The system would be enforced through a digital identity via a QR code. If an individual is in compliance with “what the WHO has mandated for you–testing, shots, boosters–then you get to travel, or you don’t get to travel,” Bachmann said.
- Medical records and currency would eventually merge with the technology, all overseen by the WHO.
- “This is the intention of the Biden administration. They want to empower the World Health Organization so that the whole world can come under the World Health Organization’s control of emergency powers, but also so that we have a digital ID and a QR code and we’re restricted based upon what the World Health Organization allows based on that QR code,” Bachmann stated.
“The Biden Administration is Trying to Push All 194 Nations to Give Up Their Sovereignty…to the WHO” – Dean Michele Bachmann with Steve Bannonhttps://t.co/f7lm3Fqka3
— The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) April 13, 2023
COMMITMENT TO A PANDEMIC ACCORD:
- The U.S. Department of State shared a press release that described the United States’ commitment to a Pandemic Accord, “to form a major component of the global health architecture for generations to come.”
- The accord does not support “common but differentiated responsibilities and capabilities,” according to the press release, as the “concept is not appropriate in the context of pandemic PPR,” speaking of so-called “Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response,” which stands for a way to describe the set of measures and strategies required to address the global health crisis posed by the COVID-19 virus popularized by the WHO.
- The statement also addresses equity, saying that a “commitment to ‘equity’ must address inequities not only between countries, but also within them. Not just protecting populations from pandemics – but also from illness, death, and disrupted access to essential health care services during pandemics, including sexual and reproductive health services.”
- “Finally, the Pandemic Accord must stand the test of time while building on the lessons from previous pandemics,” the press release concludes. “By creating solutions that are flexible and adaptable, by laying out commitments that are clear regarding triggers and responsibilities, and by strengthening coordination and capacities, together we can build a stronger global health architecture for all.”
“I don’t think we will forgive ourselves if we don’t agree on this #PandemicAccord, and repeat the same mistakes when another pandemic hits. And our children and grandchildren will also not forgive us,” warns @DrTedros on the failure to agree on a pandemic accord. pic.twitter.com/A2U4wyhrVL
— Global Health Strategies (@GHS) April 8, 2023