Will The Marburg Virus Become The Next Pandemic-Level Fear Campaign?

Also see: A Possible Marburg Virus – RiVax – Final Solution

According to a report from the Australian National Review, there’s growing speculation that the world could be in store for another pandemic-level fear campaign regarding a little known but highly deadly virus: the Marburg virus.

The World Health Organization notes that the Marburg virus was first discovered in 1967 following two simultaneous outbreaks in Marburg and Frankfurt, Germany, and Belgrade, Serbia.

Apparently, the virus bears a fatality ratio of 88%, with those infected experiencing hemorrhagic fevers that can lead to one bleeding out of various orifices – as in discharging blood from the anus, nose, gums, and possibly genitalia.

Like a novel virus of recent memory, the Marburg virus was, of course, linked to laboratory work back in the 1960s, specifically labs that had been using African green monkeys that were later determined to be the origin of the virus.

In later outbreaks of the virus throughout the years (that occurred mostly in Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda), it was learned that prolonged exposure to mines or caves where Rousettus bat colonies resided also resulted in Marburg virus infections.

By all accounts, a Marburg infection can essentially death sentence within ten days following an infection, but cases are extremely rare.

But according to the Australian National Review report regarding the Marburg virus, there’s growing suspicion that Marburg will be used at the next fear-driven campaign in the era of COVID – and officials blaming the virus for COVID jab-related injuries.

“The next Plandemic is going to be the Marburg virus. This is a hemorrhaging fever similar to Ebola with an 88% mortality rate. Now firstly, don’t worry, the ones pushing this agenda won’t release anything that would kill them. This will be fake Marburg. Many of the covid vaccine injured are displaying clots and uncontrollable bleeding. This will be claimed to be Marburg.”

While some could attribute to these concerns a conspiratorial label and easily brush them off, back in April of 2021, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance released a report titled “The Next Pandemic: Marburg?” – which Gavi (formerly known as Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization) was formed in 1999 and got some of their initial funding from none other than the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Per the April 2021 Gavi article, Marburg was referred to as the “deadly cousin of Ebola” and speculated whether “increasing globalization” will result in a pandemic-level threat.

“Pandemic threat: As Marburg virus can spread from human to human through contact of bodily fluids, much like Ebola. As outbreaks in Europe and the US have already shown, increasing globalization and international travel means that the risk for global spread is high, especially when the incubation period could be up to three weeks. This could be disastrous given its high death rate.”

Going back to the Australian National Review report, it’s suspected that allowing international travel for those who’ve obtained their COVID jab will set the stage for declaring there’s a sudden Marburg outbreak – thus causing massive panic to spread.

“They’ll need a cover for people bringing ‘the virus’ back to their home countries. A new pandemic will be declared, they’ll claim there is asymptomatic spread. The media will pump fear harder than we’ve ever seen. People will lose their minds believing that there is a pandemic of something with an 88% chance of making them bleed out and die.”

Suddenly, new jab mandates will be ushered in for people needing to be inoculated for Marburg – which while there isn’t an approved vaccine for the disease currently, one is being actively studied.

If this does occur, the panic instilled among the people, and the government response we saw during the onset of COVID will pale in comparison.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Red Voice Media. Contact us for guidelines on submitting your own commentary. Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a “vaccine.” According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it’s intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.