The UK Government have released their 11th report on adverse reactions to the Covid-19 “vaccines” reported to the MHRA Yellow Card scheme using data inputted from the 9th December 2020 up to the 5th April 2021. With it came the announcement that they are now 100% confident that the Covid “vaccines” are safe for use in pregnant women. This is an extremely dangerous announcement based on no scientific evidence, with evidence to the contrary as we’ll reveal in our analysis of the 11th report.
Up to the 5th April the UK Government and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) claim an estimated 11 million first doses of the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine and 20.6 million first doses of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine had been administered. They also claim around 4.4 million second doses of the Pfizer jab had been administered and 1 million second doses of the Oxford University / AstraZeneca jab had been administered. This represents an increase of 1.2 million first doses and 1.8 million second doses on the previous week.
The current rate according to the UK Government and MHRA of people suffering an adverse reaction to one of the jabs stands at 1 in every 166 people. However it is thought around only 1% of people actually report an adverse reaction to the Yellow Card scheme so the rate is most likely significantly higher. (You can report an adverse reaction to the Covid gene therapy jabs here)
What we’re about to reveal from the data shown in the 11th report is astounding, disturbing and extremely concerning. This is what found…
You will have now heard of the blood clot events associated with the AstraZeneca vaccine leading several countries to suspend it’s use and the UK to now announce that “a different vaccine should be offered” to those aged under 30. You may have also heard of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine causing the same problem in the USA? Well that’s because they are the same vaccine – the only difference between them is that the aborted foetus cell used in the AstraZeneca jab is around 10 years older than the one used in the Johnson & Johnson jab. This raises the question of why the Johnson & Johnson jab supposedly works as a single dose but the AstraZeneca jab only works as a double dose, because they are the same – but that’s a story for another day.
This is the latest statement contained withinin the MHRA’s summary of the 11th report on adverse reactions to the Covid “vaccines” –
Up to 5 April 2021, the MHRA had received Yellow Card reports of 100 cases of major thromboembolic events (blood clots) with concurrent thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) in the UK following vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca. These events occurred in 61 women and 39 men aged from 18 to 85 years and the overall case fatality rate was 22% with 22 deaths.
Of these, 99 reports were associated with the first dose of the vaccine and a single report followed a second dose, although this individual had medical conditions that could have caused the events. Fifty individuals had cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (average age 46 years) and 50 had other major thromboembolic events (average age 52 years) with concurrent thrombocytopenia.
So the average age of the person suffering from these events is 52, but the MHRA are only advising that those under 30 should be offered the option of a different “vaccine”. This doesn’t make sense.
But whilst the AstraZeneca jab is getting terrible press, nobody is talking about the serious adverse reactions that have occurred due to the Pfizer jab. Now when we look at the numbers they do show that the AstraZeneca jab is an extremely serious cause for concern, but that doesn’t mean the Pfizer jab should be let off the hook.
For instance due to the Pfizer mRNA jab there have been 3,484 reports of Lymphadenopathy. This is a condition that results in a terrible skin rash, unexplained weight loss, an enlarged spleen (the organ that filters the blood) and fever and night sweats. Doesn’t this sound worse than the alleged disease it is supposed to protect against?
There have also been cases of thrombocytopenia occurring due to the Pfizer jab, not as many as have occurred due to the AstraZeneca jab but they are still occurring. There have been 27 cases of immune thrombocytopenia, and 34 cases of thrombocytopenia resulting in 1 death. But all in all there have been 4210 blood disorders reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab, this is significantly more than what have occurred due to AstraZeneca, especially considering the fact there have been 6 million more doses of the AstraZeneca jab administered.
There have been 79 cases of immune thrombocytopenia due to the AstraZeneca jab resulting in 1 death, and 173 cases of thrombocytopenia resulting in 2 deaths. In all the AstraZeneca jabs have caused a total of 3681 blood disorders.
Next up is cardiac disorders, of which the Pfizer jab has caused 1675 resulting in 46 deaths. 22 of these deaths occurred due to the 50 cases of cardiac arrest reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab. But there is also another condition with concerning numbers – Tachycardia.
Tachycardia is an extremely high heart rate that occurs without explanation. This the NHS advice on tachycardia…
