Why are companies so against the bill when it doesn’t ban anything and only requires transparency? What do they have to hide?
It’s not a stretch to think that they consider Missouri House Bill 1169 a serious threat because many of them are selling foods that can have gene-altering effects.
The bill would also prevent Big Pharma’s attempts to use the food supply as a tool to distribute vaccines to unknowing consumers.
Renz warned that Big Pharma will do whatever it takes to prevent people from finding out that they have plans to “use food to alter their genetics.” Unfortunately, this means some farmers are also being set up as the fall guys.
Additionally, major factory-farmers like Bill Gates have legal teams that can help protect the torts that may come if the food supply starts poisoning consumers while the small farmers could be at risk of being sued if it turns out that the food they are selling is unsafe, even if most of them don’t understand what is happening.
If the corn growers, soybean, cattle and pork associations really care about farmers, they should be demanding that seed companies and vaccine manufacturers indemnify small farmers rather than opposing a bill that requires them to tell farmers exactly what is in their products.
Missouri House Bill 1169 would help protect farmers from being sued because it would force the makers of GMO seeds and vaccines to be transparent about putting potential gene therapies into their products.
If the bill is passed in Missouri, it would also help protect the American food supply from contamination with gene-altering vaccines.
In the meantime, Mercola advises consumers to avoid all pork products, including organic products, that may have been tainted with mRNA vaccines.