Funding the Control Grid Part 1: The Biomedical Framework

Background & Context

Agencies Involved in Gain-of-Function Research & the Origins of Covid

Mountains of evidence now confirm that Fauci’s NIH/NIAID funded dangerous gain-of-function research through EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology leading up to the release of the Covid bioweapon. Furthermore, there is overwhelming evidence, including Fauci’s own emails, that shows attempts by U.S. government agencies as well as the World Health Organization (WHO) to cover it up.
The Department of Defense (DOD), Health and Human Services (HHS), State Department (USAID,) National Science Foundation (NSF), and others contributed over 120 million dollars to EcoHealth Alliance for years continuing through 2020. About one third of those contributions came directly from the Pentagon, the majority of which came from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), a department of the DOD that focuses on countering and deterring “weapons of mass destruction.”
Since the release of the Covid bioweapon, U.S. government agencies and organizations including NIH, USAID and NSF have continued to fund and support EcoHealth Alliance using millions of taxpayer dollars. Despite the overwhelming evidence that U.S. agencies and organizations helped to create the Covid bioweapon, in July 2021 the Defense Department’s DTRA awarded EcoHealth a $368,000 contract through September 2024 to conduct scientific research on “combating weapons of mass destruction” and “predicting biothreat impacts.”
In August 2022 the NSF awarded EcoHealth Alliance and Boston University a 1 million dollar grant to “predict and prevent future pandemics.” Following the partnership between EcoHealth Alliance and Boston University to “predict and prevent future pandemics,” in October 2022 Boston University published more gain-of-function research that created a deadlier Covid virus with an 80% kill rate in mice that were tested. The publication acknowledged NIH and NIAID for their contributions to this research.

Developing & Deploying mRNA Injections More Dangerous Than Covid

In December 2019 (prior to public knowledge of the release of the Covid bioweapon) a confidential agreement signed by Ralph Baric, a key scientist connected to the origins of Covid, reveals that NIAID and Moderna agreed to transfer research specifically related to “mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna.” Based on the confidential agreements, collaboration between NIAID and Moderna on the creation of mRNA-based vaccines dates back to 2015. Furthermore, a study found genetic sequences in the Covid spike protein match genetic sequences patented by Moderna in 2016, which researchers concluded that there is only a one-in-three-trillion chance could occur naturally.
Under a court-ordered disclosure due to a FOIA request, the FDA released a cache of 80,000 pages of Pfizer documents pertaining to approval of the Covid mRNA injection for Emergency Use Authorization. The documents reveal that Pfizer became aware of deaths and adverse events during clinical trials of the Covid jab but classified almost all adverse events, including serious ones, as “not related,” to the shots. Despite serious adverse events, the dangerous mRNA injections were approved, and even mandated for the masses.
The latest statistics from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the DOD Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), excess mortality data, as well as published studies and reports have shown catastrophic increases in deaths, disabilities, illnesses, infertility, and miscarriages due to the Covid mRNA jab, confirming that the mRNA injection is much worse than the Covid bioweapon itself.
Despite the known catastrophic adverse events related to the Covid injection, government agencies are fast-tracking the deployment of mRNA technology for other vaccines and medicines. At least 200 clinical trials are listed in ClinicalTrials.gov for mRNA-based vaccines or medicines and 50 clinical trials are currently enrolling for new mRNA-based vaccines, according to Dr. Malone. NIH-funded research is leading to the creation of a “universal flu vaccine” using mRNA technology. Both Moderna and Pfizer are in phase 3 clinical trials of their mRNA flu injections.

Expanding the Biomedical Control Grid Through Biotechnology, Digital Vaccine Passports & Perpetual Global Health Emergencies

In March 2022, the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) was created to conduct “high risk, high reward” research for the purposes of “developing mRNA vaccines to prevent most cancers” among several other objectives.
A September 2022 Biden Executive Order calls for a “whole-of-government approach to advance biotechnology and biomanufacturing,” stating, “We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers; unlock the power of biological data, including through computing tools and artificial intelligence; and advance the science of scale‑up production while reducing the obstacles for commercialization so that innovative technologies and products can reach markets faster.”
In October 2022 Johns Hopkins hosted a Catastrophic Contagion tabletop exercise in partnership with the WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation concerning a pandemic in 2025 with a “higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people.” Johns Hopkins also hosted the now infamous Event 201 tabletop exercise in partnership with the World Economic Forum (WEF) and Gates Foundation in October 2019 which predicted the Coronavirus pandemic.
In November 2022 Biden signed the G20 Declaration, committing to “global health governance” by the World Health Organization (WHO) under “a legally binding instrument” with the intention of handing over national sovereignty to the WHO. The declaration also supports collaboration on “global digital health networks” in response to future pandemics that will “build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates.”

If history is any indicator, the same entities responsible for Covid atrocities will continue their nefarious behavior with additional funding through the 2023 budget, which is outlined below.

Omnibus Bill Boosts Biomedical Control Grid Agencies

Total funding from the 2023 Omnibus bill reaches $1.7 trillion, a $134 billion increase over the 2022 budget.

ARPA-H receives $1.5 billion, an increase of $500 million
Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response receives $3.3 billion, an increase of $560 million
BARDA receives $950 million, an increase of $205 million
CDC receives $9.2 billion, an increase of $760 million
FDA receives $3.5 billion, an increase of $226 million
Global Health Programs & Pandemic Prevention receive $10.6 billion divided among the State Department with $6.4 billion and USAID with $4.2 billion
HHS receives $120.7 billion, an increase of $9.9 billion
NIH receives $47.5 billion, an increase of $2.5 billion
NSF receives $9.9 billion, an increase of $1.036 billion (largest dollar increase in NSF history)

Agencies who are part of the biomedical control grid funded through the Omnibus bill are mandated to prepare for the next pandemic, funnel more taxpayer dollars towards the development and stockpiling of mRNA injections, as well as expand surveillance tools. Sections and page numbers referenced below can be found in the Omnibus bill here.

Strategic Planning for the Next Pandemic…

Read full story here: Funding the Control Grid Part 1: The Biomedical Framework